From what I’ve read the 1650 is a bit of a clunker, relatively… if you can afford a 1660, I would go with that. Nvidia’s numbering system is a bit weird, and there is usually a bit of a jump up from a 50 to a 60 in performance and value.
The original “beta” version was posted in a beta tables thread at VPF along with a bunch of unfinished tables. Most of those links died a long time ago and that table was never officially posted as a finished table.
Anyway, it sounds like you did all the checks for permissions to use resources, etc, which is awesome. Thanks for the new v…[Read more]
Happy belated birthday, Bord. I feel like you should be the one getting the gift. Thanks for this great looking table. I want to especially thank you for doing so much work to track down these pristine resources for your tables. It’s so nice to see crisp graphics on tables with such awesome, classic art like this one.
I usually leave a comment to let the author know that I like their table and appreciate the time they took. I’m not really much into “social media” type responses because I find that whole thing anything but social. I prefer good old fashioned talking to people to express ideas, and I’m certainly not offended if someone would choose to talk to m…[Read more]
There’s a couple new cards being released in the 1600 series (not sure if they are available yet) which will be higher powered versions of the 1600, which is a great value card. You may want to look into those.
As far as the importance of a card in your system… everything in the pc is important and if you have an old processor, for in…[Read more]
Guys, the text size is in VP itself. You can ask toxie and fuzzel about it over in the VP beta thread at VPF… if I remember correctly, fuzzel already addressed this, and there was some reason it wasn’t going to change, but my memory is, generally, not to be trusted, so it wouldn’t hurt to ask.